Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Things I should have learned in school

I believe I should have been taught what I now consider to be the most important lessons in life, the knowledge of what my rights are, and how to use the Law to retain them. Beginning in 10th grade in civics, it should be emphasized over and over what the meaning of the Constitution of the United States is. What the founding fathers labored over when putting each and every word in and the effect of those words upon every man and woman in this country. With a firm understanding of what our inalienable rights are, we could go forth and make something fruitful happen for both our communities and ourselves. Rights can’t be taxed. If they could then they would be privileges and not rights and could be controlled thru taxation. There will always be those who would abuse others to benefit themselves. The only thing stopping this abuse from happening is our refusal to allow it. A little play-acting in school would quickly bring home this aspect of real life. When a bully threatens you, to get you to give up your lunch money, [it] will continue forever and may even become more severe, until we fight back.

Every tribe of humans develops rules of society for the benefit of the tribe’s survival. Not adhering to those rules has consequences. We can think of these rules as Laws. The 10 commandments are just such 'laws'. Today, things are vastly different to life thousands of years ago, yet there are many of the same issues also. When the bible decries the villainy of the “money changer” who shaved the gold coins for gain, or used rigged scales, we can see it is still the same.

The general rights we have, as listed in the Constitutions of the United States and the several States can be circumvented by specific actions we engage in. If you sign a contract that allows your boss to look at your computer files at home, that contract has more authority than the “general” right to privacy outlined in the 4th amendment. Lawyers have sought to take advantage of this aspect of 'contractual agreements' to deceive us into giving our rights away. Why does any contract need to be more than 1 page long and in type no smaller than 10point? If the law made all contracts void, for not fitting those guidelines it would eliminate a great many evils. The next point I would have wished to have been taught at school is that my signature on contracts can be very detrimental to my future and should not be taken lightly. I have the right to redact (cross out) any statements on the contract that I don’t like. The issuer can retract and not offer the contract but can’t make me sign to anything not in my best interests. And lastly, to very easily and simply protect my rights all I have to do is put the words “without prejudice” or “all rights reserved” or “under duress” above my signature and it will retain all my rights. Now, under duress and coercion is saying someone had undo pressure on me to sign, so I like “without prejudice”. Next, if you sign a legal document and you put [By:] to the left of your name it separates you from any liability created in the above document.

Now let’s look at how the average man is ensnared without realizing it in today’s society. And let’s note that we are talking about a 'society' we never joined, the Law Society. First, we are born. Yes that’s right, our parent sign a document called the “birth” certificate as an ‘informant’ (look on your certificate of live birth) and your footprint is placed on the back. Without your consent you were entered into the 'system' where the Government could start to borrow money against your future earnings based on this document. The submission (to submit) of an [application] (in Blacks law dictionary this means “to beg”) for a marriage license (a privilege granted by the STATE) gives the state the superior title to your marriage and likewise, the results of your union (children). What on earth do we receive as a benefit for getting this “license” to wed? Why not just have a service with your preacher swearing (and signing) a contract between you and your love that accomplishes the same thing and then have the wife change her name (you don’t have to legally do anything but start calling yourself the new name) and voila!, your married. This would keep Child Protective Services from being able to 'take' your property (your child). Next up we decide that since every boss needs a social security card number so we go ahead and get one of those even though it’s supposedly not required (that is what the law says-NO REQUIREMENT). When we do, we again are in the ‘system’. Then we submit (sumission) an application (to beg) for a ‘drivers license’ because we are told by everyone that it is illegal to drive without one. Well interestingly, we are never told that the C1 (commercial) license is only required if you are engaged in commerce on the road. Why is it we have ‘passengers’ in our car? think of trains, planes, and ships- they have passengers, passengers PAY to be hauled around. We have ‘guests’ in our car (not motor vehicle) they don’t pay us thus we aren’t using our car in a ‘commercial’ capacity. If you are being paid to 'drive' then you ARE required to have a C1 or 2 or 3 license, (because congress can regulate interstate commerce) but if you aren’t you don’t need one. Once again we submit an application for a vehicle “registration” wherein we are not told by the STATE (a corporation Doing Business As….) they will now have superior title to the vehicle we PAID FOR. If you don’t believe it then explain why the STATE has the right to take our property without due process (a court decision) for expired registration tags or a DUI ticket? One can only take what one owns, and they own it because we “voluntarily” gave it to them. The same goes for your real estate holdings. Remember when we talked about not taxing rights? In the California constitution of 1879, article 1, section 1: “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.” Now why are there property taxes if owning property is a right? If we owned it in allodial status which can be done if we get a ‘land patent’ on it, then we would be immune from property taxes. Has anyone ever told us about this? Isn’t it the job of the government to tell us what are options are? Even though the government is supposedly the servants of the Sovereign people they act like we are their servants instead. How about this: "It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business....The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." California Government Code, Section 11120. Or numerous law case decisions like these: "...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves....". CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472. And: "The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative." Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.

So we see we are Kings and just don’t know it. But how does a group of devious individuals get the sovereigns to believe they are slaves? How about through signing away their rights unknowingly? Let’s talk about Money. Under the Constitution in Article 1, section 8, congress is authorized to “coin money and set the value thereof”, and again in section 10; no state can “make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of a debt”, now just think about that. The only way the Constitution can be changed is thru an amendment, which ¾ of all the states ratify. The Constitution is a “limitation” on government and it’s usurpation of power. If only Congress can coin money can they give that authority to a private corporation like the Federal Reserve? NO, not anymore than they can give their authority to “declare war” to Halliburton! So when congress gave that right to “create money out of thin air and loan it out” to the Fed they committed an act of Treason. Why treason? Because the Fed is owned mostly by foreign bankers. Every corporation is required to list its owners but no one can find an ownership statement for the creation of the Fed. Every note (promissory note) brought forth by the Fed is created as a ‘loan’. But the interest is not created at the same time, so HOW is the debt going to ever be repaid? It cant’ be, and just like musical chairs, someone will be left foreclosed upon, without the physical ability to pay. So how does this leviathan operate? Lets look at a house purchase. You find a house to buy and are eager to get a loan because you can’t afford it without one. Think about this for a minute, what would the house cost if it weren’t for Banks issuing credit? The true cost of a house in materials and labor is somewhere around $80K (+the land), yet here in Cali they go for $500K when the tide is high. So we sit down and sign a promissory note (to pay) and we are issued a Trust Deed showing the ownership of the home is with the Bank until we pay off the Bank. Actually the Bank takes the Promissory note which is nothing more than a “check” with our signature on it (and our name in all capital letters also) and deposits the full amount signed for. We then through our signature became “owners” of the house but we agreed to a “mortgage” also. The Bank sells the “mortgage” also, for full face value. Thus we pay twice + interest for the house. Answer this, why if there is a Mortgage (signed) that won’t release interest in the property until the debt is paid do you need a promissory note (signed) also? Especially one that states you “waive the right to ask for any presentments” The next thing woefully deficient in our education is that since contracts are so important shouldn’t we be aware of the fundamental elements of a lawful contract? First there has to be an ‘offer’ and ‘acceptance’ wherein it is clear what is being offered and accepted (nothing hidden). This is called a “meeting of the minds”. Second there has to be 2 or more parties with “wet-ink” signatures on the contract. If only one party signs it’s a unilateral contract, and easily voidable. Third there has to be “consideration” exchanged. Something of value is given and received by each party. And fourth it has to be legal; you can’t have a contract to commit a crime. The Home loan fails badly in these requirements because the factual notice of what occurs financially is left out. They never tell you that they created the money being “loaned” to you out of thin air, they never tell you your signature brought the money into existence and you paid for the house with it. See the credit river decision: HERE for a case wherein the judge ruled that the Bank had no Constitutional authority to create money out of thin air and to call it “consideration” whereas the homeowner (being foreclosed upon) had given “consideration” in the form of his labor (exchanged for money) and paid to the Bank. Next there are never any signatures on the Bank papers except yours-why, because it would be legally ‘fraud’ and they don’t want to go to jail. This same process occurs with every loan we get, such as a credit card or car. It is our signature that ‘creates’ the money that funds the purchases and if you send a letter to the credit card company offering to pay any monies owed by you upon proof of financial loss on their part by fiduciary accounting – they will not be able to show you the loss and thus prove you have no debt to them. All the money you send in has real value, because you had to exchange labor for it, whereas all the money they sent you has no value because they “created” it from thin air. The real loser in this scheme is the population who now has had the total amount of money in circulation increased as a result of the money created, making their savings worth less and the empire builder (the Fed) becomes larger. One more thing, any debt collector is a ‘third party’ and since you have NO contract with them, they have absolutely no authority over you. Ask them to show you the contract you have with them, or leave you alone, or be charged with fraud.

Lets move on to the IRS. These thugs are the collection agency for the International Monetary Fund, they are not a federal agency as is proved in a court case I’ve seen wherein the DOJ stated as much. The Internal Revenue Code is Title 26 and has never been enacted into Law by congress and nowhere in the code is the word “income” defined. The Eighth circuit court of appeals said: “the general term ‘income’ is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code” U.S. vs. Ballard (1976). If you follow the supposed code thru Pete Hendrickson’s’ book “Cracking the Code”, see: THIS you are not liable for a tax on your ‘reciepts’ for labor unless you work for the Federal Government. Everyone has a “right” to work and rights cant be taxed. The jurisdiction of ‘laws’ created by congress, extends only to Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, The Virgin Islands and American Samoa. If you believe the FBI, FEMA, ATF, etc. have any jurisdiction to operate within a state you are wrong. If you call the sheriff he can arrest any one of them for violating your rights (although he probably will fear them as you do). If you want to stop paying taxes and get everything back including Social Security and Medicare payments, I suggest you apply Pete’s methods and include a revocation of Power of Attorney and a declaration of your being ‘one of the people’ of whatever sovereign republic state you live in. There is a lot to read up on before you become aware of the ploys used by the government but they are just that ploys, and not laws. All trials ending in convictions for tax protesters are gotten through juries not knowing the actual laws and listening to judges who “manage” them by their “instructions”. Even with that the government is facing an avalanche of tax revolt, notice in this article where it states ½ of the citizens don’t pay taxes in America: . So if it’s not fear, why do we pay taxes? Is fear and threats of abuse a good reason to violate “thou shall not steal” or are those ‘people’ in government exempt from the laws applying to theft? The common excuse put forth by the government is that it operates under the authority given them by the people. Well, if I can’t steal from my neighbor, exactly how did I give something I don’t posses to the government? I know I don’t pay taxes, and feel it is theft. The government won’t allow you to argue in court the ‘income tax’ is unconstitutional, or the 5th amendment protects me from testifying against myself, or I have a right to privacy in my papers, and whatever you do argue, the government in court (and believe me there is a major conflict of interest going on when the judges salary is hinged on your case) won’t tell you –WHY you’re wrong, and where you are mistaken in your case. In any other court case the plaintiff (complainer) has to outline the injury, provide facts and witnesses supporting the fact of the injury (who, what, where, when, how, and why) and seek damages. But the government magically is immune from describing any actual factual evidence where their claim comes from. Look at any tax protester case and you will be amazed at reading the transcripts how the IRS agents that are witnesses are protected from answering pertinent questions by the “fair and impartial’ judge. In Irwin Schiffs transcripts it shows judge Dawson refusing to allow any Supreme Court decisions in [His] court by Irwin. Keep in mind this is a Federal Court they are pleading in and you have to wonder how the ‘Law of the Land’ was suspended by this judge and [he] not be hung for treason.

Now how would your life be different if you didn’t have the IRS in your life? (this country got by for 125 years without one), and no Federal Reserve inflating the money supply and causing all the wealth in this country to funnel it’s way back to them. They actually are the true masters because they required the Federal government to pay the interest on the money (created from thin air) loaned to it, in actual gold. As the Federal government went bankrupt in 1933 (ran out of gold) and turned over control to the Fed then. Look up House Joint Resolution 192. Now do you understand why no politician can change anything? They are employees of the Fed and can only act upon it’s wishes. The Fed is at the same time scared of the people because no Oligarchy (elite group in power) can control a population that refuses its’ control. More and more people are becoming first aware, and second defiant and demanding of their public servants and the true master (the Fed- or more correctly the Queen of England) whats rightfully theirs.

1 comment: